Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Bonnell v. Colton et al
as 2:2011cv14260
Plaintiff:
Richard A Bonnell
Defendant:
Bruce Colton, Jeffery Davis, Diamond R. Litty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01277
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOWELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HOWELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02204
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOWELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCRUGGS v. E.H. O'NEILL COMPANY, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv79933
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOWELL SCRUGGS
Defendant:
E.H. O'NEILL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, GARLOCK, INC. , SCAPA WAYCROSS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Redus et al
as 5:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Walter Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Carl Redus, Pine Bluff Arkansas, City of, Daniel Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Vacca et al v. Howell et al
as 2:2008cv04445
Plaintiff:
John Vacca, Ralph Natale, Matthew Matassa and others
Defendant:
Jay Howell, John Howell, Susan Howell Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCRUGGS v. E.H. O'NEILL COMPANY, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2008cv86964
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOWELL SCRUGGS
Defendant:
E.H. O'NEILL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, GARLOCK, INC., SCAPA WAYCROSS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
