Cases 1 - 10 of 15
John Johns v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 22-3271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN JOHNS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
David John v. L. McEwen
as 22-55889
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID JOHN JOHN
Respondent / Appellee:
L. S. MCEWEN, Warden
Fredricks v. Correction Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2020cv05792
Defendant:
Deputy Officer John Doe, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Officer John Shaheen and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Naquan Fredricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01336
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JOHN JOHNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parchinski v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Parchinski
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Vincent Mooney , Robert McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. John Posey
as 17-50888
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN LEE POSEY, also known as John-John
David John v. L. McEwen
as 17-56424
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID JOHN JOHN
Respondent - Appellee:
L. S. MCEWEN, Warden
Passons v. Osage Nation Government et al
as 4:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Russell Allen Passons
Defendant:
Osage Nation Government, Department of the Interior, Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Bey v. Anna M. Kross Correctional
as 13-3578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stanley Aristilde El-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Anna M. Kross Correctional Facility, Human Trafficking Agents of the A.M.C.K. (C95), Orr, Badge #13344 and others
John Williams, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corr
as 13-13591
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEWIS WILLIAMS, JR., a.k.a. John John
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
