Cases 1 - 10 of 15
KING v. CEPEDA et al
as 2:2019cv04294
Defendant:
TRANSFER TRAILER SERVICES, VOYAGER TRUCKING CORPORATION, ABC CORPORATION (s) 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KING v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv13257
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNSEL, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELSYA HARRELL, MICHAEL KING, FRANK KING and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KING v. RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA INC
as 2:2010cv06019
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING
Defendant:
RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John King v. John Palakovich, et al
as 10-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PALAKOVICH and ATTY GEN PA
KING v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv67665
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
F.A. DAVIS COMPANY v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2010cv00622
Plaintiff:
F.A. DAVIS COMPANY
Defendant:
JOE B. CLARKE, JR, SHIRLEY C. HOEL, THE ESTATE OF JOHN KING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KING
as 2:2009mc00089
Petitioner:
JOHN KING and JOHN KING
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
