Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SHAW et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF VAN SHAW, SGT. MATHEW PARIS, JOHN LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. USA
as 5:2019cv00122
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Lewis Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant:
KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Common Cause et al v. Representative David R. Lewis et al
as 5:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JOHNSON, PAULA ANN CHAPMAN, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, Joshua Malcolm, RALPH E HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WRAY v. HOOKS
as 1:2018cv00728
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wray v. Hooks
as 1:2017cv00177
Petitioner:
John Lewis Wray, Jr.
Respondent:
Eric A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRAY v. HOOKS
as 1:2017cv00681
Petitioner:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRAY v. HOOKS
as 1:2017cv00592
Petitioner:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRAY v. HOOKS
as 1:2017cv00526
Petitioner:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
