Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Lucas v. County of Kern, et al
as 20-16439
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BARKER, MARY CLAIRE WALSH, COUNTY OF KERN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LUCAS
David High v. John Lucas, et al
as 20-2211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Bradley High
Defendant / Appellee:
John Lucas and Brian Fritzie
Luca v. Kudulis, Reisinger, and Price, LLC
as 0:2020cv60004
Defendant:
Kudulis, Reisinger, and Price, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Luca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv63035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert DeShetler, Jr., et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
as 19-3012
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US LLC, INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, REGION 2B
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SHARP, LEAH R. WITHROW, SHAWN MADALINKSI and others
John Lucas Tree Expert Co v. National Grid Corporate Services LLC et al
as 3:2014mc00085
Plaintiff:
John Lucas Tree Expert Co
Defendant:
National Grid Corporate Services LLC, Granite State Electric Company, Massachusetts Electric Company and others
Movant:
ISN Software Corporation
George Yarid v. Layton Harman
as 13-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ALEXANDER YARID
Defendant - Appellee:
LAYTON HARMAN, ROBERT ROONEY, JOHN LUCAS and others
Yarid v. Harman et al
as 3:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
George Alexander Yarid
Defendant:
Layton Harman, Robert Rooney, John Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
