Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dixon v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Todd Portune, Commissioner, Cooley Turner, Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Judge John (NMN) Williams, Dwayne R. Bowman, Commissioner Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Hamilton County Juvenile Court et al
as 1:2018cv00462
Defendant:
Denise Driehaus, Judge Melissa Powers, Nya Cruse and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda A Smith, T A Jo and Tiffany Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Graham , Sharone Graham , Teaunte Alexander and others
Defendant:
John M Williams, Moira Weir, Genine Menefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Peterson et al
as 1:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Azuriah Hoskins
Defendant:
Peterson , Turner , Lonzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv00896
Plaintiff:
Pamela Matthews and Nefertteria Dawson
Defendant:
John M Williams , Dwayne R. Bowman and Hamilton County Board Of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRee et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2007cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kelly E McRee, Joshua C Belcher and Joshua Mills
Defendant:
John M Williams, John M Williams, Brad Boruff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
