Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Homic et al v. Exphand, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01353
Defendant: Harold Protter, Sara Batterby, W. J. Kitchen and others
Plaintiff: Charles Ranney, Charles Homic, Todd Dolphin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Samuel Major-Davis v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-11383
Petitioner - Appellant: SAMUEL JOHN MAJOR-DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Samuel Major-Davi
as 17-10983
Movant: In re: SAMUEL JOHN MAJOR-DAVIS
Major-Davis v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00691
Petitioner: Samuel John Major-Davis
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Major-Davis v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00436
Petitioner: Samuel John Major-Davis
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Major-Davis v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv02373
Petitioner: Samuel John Major-Davis
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Samuel Major-Davi
as 14-20438
Movant: In re: SAMUEL JOHN MAJOR-DAVIS
Major et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 2:2012cv02467
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff: Magan Gladys Major and John Major
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00282
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
L A Murphy, et al v. Henry Samueli, et al
as 10-55055
Plaintiff - Appellee: L A MURPHY, Derivatively on Behalf of Broadcom Corp, YEN SHEI, Derivatively on Behalf of Broadcom Corp, GORDON POSTLMAYR and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Defendant - Appellant: HENRY SAMUELI
Defendant: BROADCOM CORPORATION, SCOTT A. MCGREGOR, MAUREEN E. GRZELAKOWSKI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?