Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
MAXWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv23001
Petitioner:
JOHN MAXWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Maxwell v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
John Maxwell
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14176
Plaintiff:
Robert John Maxwell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brud Rossmann v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Kamala D. Harris, Vice President of the United States, John Maxwell Finland and others
Deatrick v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00399
Petitioner:
Tobias John-Maxwell Deatrick
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tobias DeatrickIn re: Tobias Deatrick
as 22-1285
Petitioner:
In re: TOBIAS JOHN-MAXWELL DEATRICK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zimmerman v. The John Maxwell Company, LLC
as 8:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Zimmerman
Defendant:
The John Maxwell Company, LLC
Curren v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09443
Plaintiff:
John Maxwell Curren
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
