Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Murphy
as 23-30610
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Murphy
Mulvey v. Liquid Property Group
as 23-50528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aaron Mulvey and Carolyn Mulvey
Defendant / Appellee:
Liquid Property Group, L.L.C., John Michael Tiffin and Tina Anderson
USA v. Carrasco
as 23-10578
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Carrasco
Campos v. Sales et al
as 2:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Michael Campos
Defendant:
Asst. District Atty James Sales, Judge Star Bower, Christopher Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Peden et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Amos Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
John Michael Peden, II, John Doe Entities 1-5 and John Doe Persons 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Enard v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
John Michael Enard
Respondent:
Bobbie Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adimora-Nweke et al v. Harris County Hospital District et al
as 4:2022cv04352
Defendant:
Harris County Hospital District d/b/a Harris Health System, Harris County Hospital District doing business as Harris Health System doing business as Ben Taub Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Adimora-Nweke, Adimora Law Firm, Dr. Aphaeus Ohakweh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Garza
as 22-51021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Garza
Merrill Lynch v. Palombo
as 22-20571
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Palombo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
