Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jeffery Henson v. Maharaj Tomar, et al
as 23-3723
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant:
Maharaj Alejandro Tomar, Doctor, Clinical Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low (originally named as Tomar), John P. Yates, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low, Neall Jackson, DDS, Dentist, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low (originally named as Jackson) and others
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 1:2023cv24750
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Whiteley v. C. Edge
as 23-2701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Whiteley
Defendant / Appellee:
C. Edge, Acting Warden, FCI Forrest City, Arkansas (originally named as John P. Yates)
Kenneth Rose v. John Yates
as 23-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Rose
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden
Nestor Tirado-Barbosa v. John Yates
as 23-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nestor Tirado-Barbosa
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden
Gooch v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gooch
Defendant:
John P Yates and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plunkett v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Collette Peters, John P Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Yates
as 3:2023cv01623
Petitioner:
Kevin Green
Respondent:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
