Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Phillips et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01794
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of , Scottsdale Police Department , Alan G Rodbell and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillips and Preson Phillips, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stier v. Perry et al
as 1:2013cv00412
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo, Shirley Arnold-Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Stier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fulcher v. State of California et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fulcher
Defendant:
State of California and John Phillips Grant, M.D., III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fulcher v. State of California et al
as 4:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fulcher
Defendant:
State of California and John Phillips Grant, M.D., III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marino v. Nauyalis et al
as 1:2011cv22456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marino
Defendant:
Joseph Vincent Nauyalis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Phillips v. City of Oakland, et al
as 11-15613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, KAREN P. TANDY, SCOTT N. SCHOOLS and others
John Phillips v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-15614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
