Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Proctor v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
John Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
John Dickson, Jr. v. U. S. Dept of Justice
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, In her Individual capacity, acting under Color of federal and State Law, Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, DANA JAMES BOENTE, in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962 and others
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Chauncey Payne v. City of Laurel, Maryland
as 09-1837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY LOUIS PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAUREL, MARYLAND, a municipal corporation, DAVID CRAWFORD and JOHN PROCTOR
Proctor v. Green et al
as 3:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
John Proctor
Defendant:
Lori Green, Cindy Casey, John Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Payne v. City Of Laurel Maryland
as 1:2007cv00583
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Louis Payne
Defendant:
City Of Laurel Maryland, David Crawford and John Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
