Cases 21 - 30 of 32
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 10-50527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE USA and others
John Demos, Jr. v. United States of America, et al
as 10-60391
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
John Demos, Jr. v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 10-30441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, U S PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF TREASURY and others
John Demos, Jr. v. USA
as 10-50417
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Demos v. USA
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Demos, Jr. v. James Caldwell, et al
as 10-30314
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. CALDWELL, WARDEN, Unknown, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-50305
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Demos v. Attorney General et al
as 6:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, U S President, U S Secretary Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos, Jr. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Demos v. Glebe
as 1:2010cv00144
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
Patrick Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
