Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Waseem Daker v. John Robinson, et al
as 13-14873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBINSON, Officer, J. SIMPSON, GARY D. GEORGE, Chief, Alpharetta Plicce Department and others
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv05606
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, ET.AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Graham et al
as 9:2012cv01717
Plaintiff:
Desmond Quick
Defendant:
Harold Graham, John Robinson, John Pelc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dawes et al
as 1:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, Mark Anthony Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Robinson, J. Simpson, Gary D. George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2011cv06074
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCluskey v. Vincent, et al
as 11-2736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN MCCLUSKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARDI L. VINCENT, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, ELIZABETH NIGHTINGALE and others
JOHNSON v. CAPUTO et al
as 5:2011cv02603
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
EMELIA CAPUTO , VICTORIA GESSNER , WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00813
Petitioner:
John Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
