Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Roe v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
as 3:2017cv05966
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Intervenor:
Rosebank Road Medical Services Ltd. dba Rosebank Road Medical Centre and Geeta Murali Ganesh
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Roe #2 et al v. John Francis Mcguire, M.D. et al
as 5:2016cv01532
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc., DOES, Fallbrook Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe #2, Jane Roe #3, John Roe #3 and others
Kelly Ann Allen et al v. City of Pomona
as 2:2016cv01859
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Allen, Robert Bell, Jr., Seth Croy and others
Defendant:
City of Pomona
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Roe et al v. Berkeley Unified School District
as 3:2015cv03871
Plaintiff:
John Roe , Jane Roe and Jason Roe
Defendant:
Berkeley Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Victor Henderson v. Ralph Ziman et al
as 2:2014cv03042
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, Inclusive, John Roe and Ralph Ziman
Plaintiff:
Victor Henderson
Roe v. Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, et al
as 2:2014cv00917
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, Reno Orthopedic Clinic, Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Glenn Bosworth v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bosworth
Defendant:
Jane Roes, John Roes and United States of America
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2010cv04768
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
