Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SCHOLL v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv01837
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHOLL
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8131 Federal Employee's Compensation Act (FECA)
Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 9:2022cv80288
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith, Andy Green Jr., Bakhtiar Golbenaz and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Green et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 9:2022cv80291
Plaintiff:
Andy Green, Jr., Tina Culclager, Tangie Sims and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 1:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith, Andy Green Jr., Bakhtiar Golbenaz and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Green et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andy Green, Jr., Tina Culclager, Tangie Sims and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scholl et al v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 9:2020cv80269
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Hoag, John Scholl and Ryan Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scholl et al v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 0:2019cv03044
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Hoag, John Scholl and Ryan Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Junker v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2008cv05159
Plaintiff:
Bradley S Junker
Defendant:
Dan Birkholz, Cottonwood, County of, Doug Bristol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
