Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Paxton v. Richards et al
as 5:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Barry Paxton
Defendant:
Shawn Richards , David Glass, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fineola Ingram, et al v. Cole County, et al
as 16-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fineola Ingram, Justin Simmons and Brian Boykin
Defendant - Appellee:
Cole County, Sheriff Greg White and John Wheeler
Ingram et al v. Cole County et al
as 2:2015cv04156
Plaintiff:
Fineola Ingram , Justin Simmons and Brian Boykin
Defendant:
Cole County , Greg White and John Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seif v. Kelly et al
as 5:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Seif
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Marvin Evans, Joshua Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Robinson v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
as 14-2282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles James Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Andrews, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Danny Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit and Alex Bray, Chaplain, East Arkansas Regional Unit
Defendant:
Eatmon, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, John Wheeler, Chaplain Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Freeman v. Budnick et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman
Defendant:
Christopher Budnick, Joe Page, III, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Kelley, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, John Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. May et al
as 5:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Larry May, Aundrea Weekly, John Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson/Jesus v. Andrews et al
as 2:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Charles J Robinson/Jesus
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrews, Eatmon, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
