Cases 21 - 30 of 85
SHEPHERD v. HTD CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HENRY T. DAVIS, HTD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MONIER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SAMARCO et al v. COOK et al
as 2:2019cv04086
Plaintiff:
LORI SAMARCO and JOSEPH SAMARCO
Defendant:
AUSTIN COOK and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago et al v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2019cv00898
Defendant:
John Doe, Thomas Carter, City of Harrisburg and others
Plaintiff:
Waleska Santiago, Jamie Winston and Kobe Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAMER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv00539
Defendant:
SHIRLEY EPPERSON, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM PEDUTO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MCCOY v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2018cv04123
Plaintiff:
AARON MCCOY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE/SERGEANT JOSEPH JENKINS, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE POLICE PERSONNEL (1-5), DETECTIVE KEENYA TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. John Does and Jane Does 1-10 et al
as 1:2018cv01824
Defendant:
Dauphin County and John Does and Jane Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhines v. Ball et al
as 3:2018cv01643
Defendant:
Mr. Parkin, MD Carvajal, FCI Allenwood and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Rhines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
