Cases 111 - 120 of 176
Miles, Jr. v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv02215
Plaintiff:
Daivd Wayne Miles, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Jones, Greg Donaldson, Kenny Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Hill et al
as 5:2017cv05213
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Avery
Defendant:
Joshua Hill, W.C.D.C. Captain, Randall Denzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Karas et al
as 5:2017cv05194
Plaintiff:
William Bethel
Defendant:
Richard Karas, John and Jane Doe Nurses and Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Principal Life Insurance Company Group et al
as 2:2017cv02130
Plaintiff:
Scotty Don Edwards
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company Group , Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. and John and Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis v. Walgreen Company et al
as 4:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Walgreen Company, Does John and Jane Does 1-25 and Walgreen Company doing business as Walgreens No 10059
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Holloway et al
as 5:2017cv05099
Plaintiff:
Destin Allen Lewis
Defendant:
Holloway, R. Holt, John or Jane Doe Dietician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corona-Cervantes v. Caudle et al
as 5:2017cv05098
Plaintiff:
J. Felix Fernando Corona-Cervantes
Defendant:
Sam Caudle, Morgan and John or Jane Doe Food Service Workers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Doe
as 6:2017cv06048
Plaintiff:
Derick D. Tucker
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. John Doe Doctor et al
as 5:2017cv05068
Plaintiff:
Donald S. Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Nurses, R. Holt, Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. County of Benton, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05063
Plaintiff:
Adrian Michael Flores
Defendant:
County of Benton, Arkansas, Shawn Holloway, James Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
