Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Blake Swann v. Johnson County, TN Sheriff's Office, et al
as 26-5993
Defendant:
BRADLEY SEXTON, J. SHAWN BROWN, SHERIFF BIT BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
BLAKE O'BRYAN SWANN
Tolson (ID 2000039416) v. Johnson County
as 5:2026cv03379
Plaintiff:
Arlando Ray Tolson, Sr.
Defendant:
Johnson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03250
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JOSHLIN v. JOHNSON COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2026cv01928
Plaintiff:
BRYAN A. JOSHLIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN DOE JAIL OFFICERS 1-5, JOHN/JANE DOE MEDICAL PERSONNEL 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Johnson County, Kansas
as 2:2026cv02546
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Phillips and Jenniffer Phillips
Defendant:
Johnson County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McKnight v. Johnson County Sheriffs
as 3:2026cv03074
Petitioner:
Cary Boyce McKnight
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McKnight v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 3:2026cv02706
Petitioner:
Cary Boyce McKnight
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 3:2026cv02672
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Demetric Williams
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
