Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Muldrow v. Sessions, et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lealon (Amir Musa) Muldrow
Defendant:
Jefferson B Sessions, III, Thomas Kane, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Mark v. Lee Spears, et al
as 17-40913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MARK
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE ANN SPEARS, KEVIN WHEAT, BALDEN POLK and others
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark, et al v. City of Shawnee
as 17-3046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CLARK and ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SHAWNEE, KANSAS
Mark v. Spears et al
as 4:2016cv03411
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Mark
Defendant:
Lee Ann Spears, Balden Polk, Jonathan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Back v. TDCJ-CID, et al
as 16-41207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BACK
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DIVISION, BALDEN POLK, JONATHAN CLARK and others
Mark v. Spears et al
as 6:2016cv01123
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Mark
Defendant:
Lee Ann Spears, Kevin Wheat, Balden Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lealon Muldrow v. Myron Batts, et al
as 16-10539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON BATTS, UNDERWOOD, Assistant Warden - FCI Big Spring, DAWN GARRETT, Chaplain - FCI Big Spring and others
Muldrow et al v. Batts et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lealon (Amir Musa) Muldrow, Suleiman Zakaria and Abdul Aziz
Defendant:
Myron Batts, FNU Underwood, Dawn Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark et al v. Shawnee, Kansas, City of
as 5:2015cv04965
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Clark and Eric S. Clark
Defendant:
Shawnee, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
