Cases 11 - 20 of 479
Wright v. Aker et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Wright
Defendant:
CO Aker, CO Westburg, E Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Bounds v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Bounds
Defendant:
Kirsten L Johnson, Randy Jones and Zack Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Marwitz et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D Jones
Defendant:
Lukas Marwitz, Mary Baggio and Robert Rymarkiewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Bobby v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dexter Jones
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDougal v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Freddie James McDougal, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, Ernell Lucas, Dr Ben Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Cortez A Jones
Defendant:
Hannah Alexander, Randoll Wilborn, Brendt A Van Wagoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Diedrick et al
as 1:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Melvin Jones
Defendant:
John Diedrick, Montrell Bridges, James Eisinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Labarge et al
as 2:2023cv01559
Plaintiff:
Waylon Dalton Jones
Defendant:
S Labarge, N Weber and Officer Kumb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Craig v. Hanson, Christopher et al
as 3:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Craig Jones
Defendant:
Christopher Hanson and Eric Diener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
