Cases 31 - 40 of 3,957
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Anderson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anderson, Dennis Arnold, Eric Caldwell and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Jones v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, JUSTIN DIOR COMBS, ETHIOPIA HABTEMARIAM and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. L3 Harris et al
as 6:2024cv06127
Plaintiff:
Tedric K. Jones
Defendant:
L3 Harris and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Los Santos v. Jones, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Lisandro Rubio De Los Santos
Defendant:
Smith Transport, Inc. and Ronald Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jones v. N.Y.P.D.
as 24-429
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
N.Y.P.D. and MONTICELLO VILLAGE P.D.
United States of America v. Rivera-Figueroa (Andino)
as 24-431
Defendant:
CESAR RIVERA-FIGUEROA, JENHSEN RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL NAVARRO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. N.Y.P.D.
as 24-417
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
N.Y.P.D., New York Police Department 34th Precinct and MONTICELLO VILLAGE P.D.
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
