Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Camacho-Gordils v. USA
as 3:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Jorge Camacho-Gordils
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jorge Camacho Cabrera v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1688
Petitioner:
JORGE CAMACHO CABRERA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nautilus Insurance Company v. City Development Group of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08382
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:
City Development Group of Chicago, Inc. and Jorge Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camacho v. Rackley
as 3:2017cv05168
Petitioner:
Jorge Camacho
Respondent:
R. Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Camacho-Gordil
as 17-1363
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE CAMACHO-GORDILS, a/k/a Cuentaloca
USA v. Israel Avila
as 17-20196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISRAEL LARA AVILA, also known as Jorge Camacho Guiterrez, also known as Misael Lara-Avila, also known as Ismael Daniel Medina, also known as Juan Daniel Lara Avila
Kim v. Camacho
as 3:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Ji Sun Kim
Defendant:
Jorge Camacho and Anna M. Camacho-Tiznado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jorge Camacho and Olivia H. Camacho
Defendant:
Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company and The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Camacho-Arroyo et al
as 3:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jorge Camacho-Arroyo, Carmen Lydia Rivera, Empresas Terrassa, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
USA v. Jorge Camacho-Oliva
as 13-50116
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE CAMACHO-OLIVAS, also known as Jorge Hernandez-Jara
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
