Cases 1 - 10 of 27
SANCHEZ-ORTIZ v. MENENDEZ et al
as 1:2023cv21172
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ORTIZ
Defendant:
OFFICER TRISTIAN J. MENENDEZ and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ et al v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01185
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NEREIDA SANCHEZ and JOSE SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTILLO v. CHASE BANK et al
as 3:2019cv15435
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK and CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01555
Defendant:
Nikky Paul, Douglas R. Sampsel, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Tineo v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1461
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO TINEO, AKA Luis Alberto Padilla, AKA Jose Sanchez
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Sanchez v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 16-1035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Facility Manager at SCI Fayette, DR. HERBIK, Medical Doctor at SCI Fayette, SUSAN BERRIER, Corrections Health Care Administrator at SCI Fayette and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SANCHEZ et al v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv06446
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ and JACOB GILL
Defendant:
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MADERA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv07619
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ MADERA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
