Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Medina, et al. v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Alba Angel Medina and Jose Vinicio Santiago Cifuentes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Santiago-Santiago v. Garland
as 23-6286
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS SANTIAGO-SANTIAGO and ROSA GRACIELA PUMA-MONTALBAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05015
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garces v. Santiago
as 2:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Garces
Defendant:
Jose F. Santiago an individual, doing business as Jose F. Santiago Landscaping
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
US v. Santiago-Rodriguez
as 22-1709
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE RAUL SANTIAGO-RODRIGUEZ
SANTIAGO DELGADO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14383
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL SANTIAGODELGADO and JOSE MANUEL SANTIAGO DELGADO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
