Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Adams v. Jackson
as 1:2022cv03777
Petitioner:
Christopher Jose Adams
Respondent:
Chief Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames Duran v. Melo Vargas et al
as 1:2022cv04761
Defendant:
Fernando R. Melo Vargas, Denisse Altagracia Castillo, Fernando Mello and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Adames Duran
Taylor v. El Centro College et al
as 3:2021cv00999
Defendant:
Dallas County Community College District, Dallas County Community College Police, El Centro College and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darrell Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAME v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19316
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ADAME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Nava-Crusillo v. William Barr
as 19-72122
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS NAVA-CRUSILLO, AKA Jose Adame-Nava, AKA Jose Estrada-Pena
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodriguez v. El Viejo Yayo, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04310
Defendant:
Jose Adames, El Viejo Yayo, Inc., Destination Food Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Romeyra Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
