Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Goldman v. McConnell Valdes, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Alan Goldman
Defendant:
McConnell Valdes, LLC, Antonio A Arias-Larcada, Jose Irizarry Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Virgo v. Irizarry et al
as 1:2023cv08242
Plaintiff:
Virgillio Virgo
Defendant:
Jose Irizarry, John Wright and Sgt. Hector Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22449
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE IRIZARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz-Saldana v. Irizarry-Vazquez et al
as 3:2019cv01447
Defendant:
JOSE Irizarry, Edna Ivelisse Irizarry, THE SUWANNEE COUNTY OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Rafael Angel Diaz, Rafael Angel Diaz-Nieves and Rafael Angel Diaz-Saldana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irizarry v. Ring et al
as 2:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jose Irizarry
Defendant:
Ring, Wyosocky and Unnamed Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc v. The estate of Ana Esther Perez Alvarado et al
as 3:2016cv02550
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc
Defendant:
The Estate of Ana Esther Perez Alvarado, Jose Irizarry-Perez, Centro de Recaudacion de Ingresos Municipales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WORRELL v. IRIZARRY et al
as 2:2015cv05153
Plaintiff:
CINDY WORRELL
Defendant:
JOSE IRIZARRY and MCDONALD'S USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GUZMAN v. CITY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2014cv00650
Plaintiff:
PEDRO GUZMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAFAEL MORERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
