Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ramirez-Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Botero-Navarro et al v. Taylorsville, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Karol Johana Botero-Navarro and Jose Manuel Ramirez-Medina
Defendant:
Taylorsville, City of, Brady Cottam and Scott Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez-Medina v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Medina
Defendant:
Mike Brown, FNU Bloom, UFN ULN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ramirez-Ramirez
as 22-10035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Rios et al v. New Limits Restoration Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv05961
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Rios and Jose Manuel Ramirez Tejada
Defendant:
New Limits Restoration Corp. doing business as New Limits, New Limits Construction Corp. doing business as New Limits and Juan Villalba
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Choque et al v. 367 Bake Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv08315
Plaintiff:
Rosa Cando, Manuel Gonzalez, Abinadi Carretero and others
Defendant:
126 Bake Corp., 2062 Bake Corp., Kamal Khadr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64995
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Ramirez-Rodriguez
as 2:2018mj30136
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Ramirez-Rodriguez
as 2:2018mj30136
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02486
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
