Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Medrano v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jose Medrano
Defendant:
Dr. Ghosh, Louis Shicker, Charles Fasano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redevelopment Agency v. Jaime Alvarez, et al
as 5:2002cv00142
Defendant:
Martin Agurrie, Antonio Alarcon, Juan Alcaraz and others
Counter Claimant:
Raul Aldaz, Jesus Arteaga, Tasha Jones and others
Cross Defendant:
Teresa Bernal, Juan Gomez and Diana Ramirez
Cross Claimant:
Jason Bosch
Unknown:
Rosalyn M Chapman, Dep In Chg E Div, Gustavo Azgad Zarate and others
Counter Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, -, City of San Bernardino, -, Redevelopment Agency of The City of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Redevelopment Agency of The City of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MEDRANO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06391
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDRANO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jose Medrano v. Marcus Hardy
as 10-2445
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE MEDRANO
Respondent - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden
Jose Medrano v. Kevin Smith, et al
as 09-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MEDRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SMITH, ARTHUR FUNK, STEPHEN DOUGHTY and others
Medrano v. Pierce
as 1:2009cv05327
Petitioner:
Jose Medrano
Respondent:
Guy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Medrano
as 08-1273
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS JOSE MEDRANO, AKA Salvador Andrade
Medrano v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jose Medrano
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Medrano et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv07026
Plaintiff:
Melissa Medrano and Jose Medrano
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
