Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Santiago v. Rural/Metro Fire Dept., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
Rural/Metro Fire Dept., Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Santiago-Ortiz v. United States of America
as 23-7744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE SANTIAGO-ORTIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Castro Canales v. Garland
as 23-6989
Petitioner:
JOSE SANTIAGO CASTRO CANALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Santiago v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19711
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03642
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guiracocha et al v. Building Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07533
Plaintiff:
Maria Guiracocha, Benjamin Paredes, Hector Javier Santiago Lopez and others
Defendant:
Building Services, Inc. doing business as Building Services, Inc., Michael Gomez and Guadalupe Castillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
US v. Jose Santiago
as 22-7369
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE SANTIAGO
Santiago v. Morton
as 1:2022cv02906
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
CO Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03762
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
