Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Bruno et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06129
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bruno and Joseph Bruno
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer CEP USA Holding Co., Zimmer US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carroll v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13360
Plaintiff:
Bernie Williams, Shanice Boyette, David Latvick and others
Defendant:
Martin Winterkorn, Jan Bures, Volkswagen Manufacturing Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUNO v. JONES
as 4:2012cv00624
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH BRUNO
Defendant:
WILLIAM JONES and C E RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Bruno-Martinez v. G. Lewi
as 12-17581
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH BRUNO-MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
G. LEWIS
Devries v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC et al
as 9:2012cv81223
Plaintiff:
Amir Haji Abbasi, Francisco Edward Acevedo, Margaret Kathryn Acosta and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Bach, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BRUNO v. TUCKER
as 3:2012cv00131
Petitioner:
PAUL JOSEPH BRUNO
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Thomas and Simone E. Pascal
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Bloomberg, Patricia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNO v. JONES
as 4:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH BRUNO
Defendant:
WILLIAM JONES, C E RICHARDSON, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv09474
Plaintiff:
Hazel Robinson and Winsome Powell
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Bloomberg, Patricia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruno-Martinez v. Lewis
as 2:2011cv02653
Petitioner:
Joseph Bruno-Martinez
Respondent:
G. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
