Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03301
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
KINCH v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE KINCH
Defendant:
REGINA CAULFIELD, JUAN SMITH, ANTONIO LACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KINCHEL v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv05242
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTHONY KINCHEL
Defendant:
JUDGE REGINA CAUFIELD, WILLIAM A. DANIEL, LISA GREY-STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORO v. QUINONES et al
as 2:2021cv11599
Defendant:
JUDGE, HON. KATHRYN BROCK, YANISA D. QUINONES and others
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Donohue, et al v. Retirement System of Allegheny, et al
as 19-1163
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF RETIREMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH DONOHUE, Executor of the Estate of SUSAN DONOHUE, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and DEBORAH KINEST, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Donohue v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donohue
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Doe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2016cv06950
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco , San Francisco Police Department, Anthony L Manfreda and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Los Angeles County Medical Association et al v. Aetna Health of California Inc et al
as 2:2012cv11020
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Abidi, David Aizuss, Mehryar Amirkiai and others
Defendant:
Aetna Health Management LLC, Aetna Health of California Inc, Aetna Life Insurance Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
