Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Duffy v. Warden
as 6:2022cv05857
Plaintiff:
Kenny Duffy and Kenny Joseph Duffy
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White et al v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2019cv02797
Defendant:
Jeremy Margolis, Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board, Jessica Trame and others
Plaintiff:
Michael White and Illinois State Rifle Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gignac v. Duffy et al
as 1:2018cv06192
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Bobby B Saadian
Plaintiff:
J Paul Gignac
Defendant:
Joseph Duffy and Nicolette Leilani Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moustakas v. Margolis et al
as 1:2017cv07563
Plaintiff:
Fotios Moustakas
Defendant:
Jeremy Margolis, Edward A Bobrick, Stephen Dinwiddie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ronald DeServi v. Jeremy Margolis, et al
as 15-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DESERVI
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBINZINA BRYANT, as Chair of the Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board, JEREMY MARGOLIS, as Chair of the Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board, SERGIO ACOSTA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duffy et al v. Seterus, Inc. et al.
as 8:2013cv02058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Duffy and Jennifer Duffy
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. et al.
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv08053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Duffy v. Loar et al
as 2:2011cv14431
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Duffy
Defendant:
Deryl Loar, William Walsh and Mark Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
