Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Perez-Tolentino v. Matal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1432
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH MATAL, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUAN C. PEREZ-TOLENTINO
Faro, Esq. v. Matal
as 1:2018cv00274
Petitioner: John H. Faro, Esq.
Respondent: Joseph Matal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corporation v. Matal
as 1:2018cv00079
Plaintiff: Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corporation
Defendant: Joseph Matal
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
In re: ArcelorMittal France
as 18-1314
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions & Duties of Director of the US Patent & Trademark Ofc
Appellant: ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE ET LORRAINE and In re: ARCELORMITTAL FRANCE
Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Matal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00922
Plaintiff: Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Defendant: Joseph Matal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00861
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
In re: Bai
as 17-2313
Appellant: SHASHI K. GUPTA, In re: JIE BAI and HENKEL IP & HOLDING GMBH
Appellee: JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions & Duties of Director of the US Patent & Trademark Ofc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?