Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7843
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanders v. City of Godley et al
as 3:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Carlos R Sanders
Defendant:
City of Godley , City of Mansfield , Joseph Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owen v. David Wade Correctional Center et al
as 5:2013cv02362
Plaintiff:
Joseph Owen, II
Defendant:
David Wade Correctional Center, Fuller, Joel Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saintal v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv01084
Defendant:
James C. Cox, Sheryl Foster, Dr. Jim Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Priscella R. Saintal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Owens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. Target Corporation
as 1:2012cv10185
Plaintiff:
Joseph Owens
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
James Owens-El v. Steven Brunson
as 12-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN BRUNSON, MARY JO WILLIAMS, NATALIE VALLANDINGHAM and others
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
