Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Simmons v. GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simmons v. US
as 23-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Lucy KOH
as 22-16600
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCY H. KOH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16606
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Kathleen Allison et al

as 2:2022cv06946
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr. and Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Simmons
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Simmons v. Allison et al

as 1:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, Brian Cates, Bailor and others
Not Classified By Court:
Laura Mae Roushion Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper-Levy et al v. City of Miami

as 1:2022cv21939
Plaintiff:
Latoyla Yasheen Cooper-Levy, Phillip Sylverin, Sherman Rivers and others
Defendant:
City of Miami
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper-Levy et al
as 1:2022cv21938
Plaintiff:
Latoyla Yasheen Cooper-Levy, Phillip Sylverin, Sherman Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.