Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 19-56213
Defendant / Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., XAVIER BECERRA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
(PC) Simmons v. Kishbaugh et al
as 2:2019cv01650
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
T R Thompson, J. Pickett, C Kishbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons. Jr. v. Saul
as 1:2019at00605
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Simmons. Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(SS) Simmons. Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01162
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Simmons. Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Melvin Joseph Simmons v. Marion E. Spearman et al
as 2:2019cv07247
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of California, Ralph Diaz, John or Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Spearman et al
as 3:2019cv01518
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of California, Ralph Diaz, Marion E. Spearman and others
Petitioner:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Watson v. Gus Christo, et al
as 19-2737
Defendant / Appellee:
GUS CHRISTO, Chaplain, JAMES SCARBOROUGH, Deputy Warden, MICHAEL KNIGHT, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. WATSON
Simmons v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv01372
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Nanc R. Beezy Micon, State California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC)Simmons v. Wuerth et al
as 2:2019cv01344
Defendant:
J. Wuerth and R. Heise
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Otsuka Pharmaceuticals et al
as 1:2019cv04758
Defendant:
The Legal Aid Society, NYC Office of Mental Hygiene Kitchen, NYS Office of Mental Hygiene and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
