Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eakle v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
David Eakle
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Falcon Owens
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jacob Varner
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ryan Francisco
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamb
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00882
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, John/Jane Doe and Joseph Wood
Plaintiff:
Robin Bailey and Zachary A. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradlin v. Henson
as 3:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spradlin
Defendant:
Officer Hensley, Superintendent Joseph Wood and Officer Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradlin v. Woods
as 3:2019cv00367
Plaintiff:
Jacob Spradlin
Defendant:
Superintendent Joseph Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
