Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Conlan v. King et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Defendant:
John Doe (1 thru 5) and Michael King
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Adam Conlan v. Eric D. Wilson
as 16-7187
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden
Conlan v. Wilson
as 1:2016cv00116
Petitioner:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joshua Conlan v. Michael King, et al
as 15-50786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KING, Detective #4127, Austin Police Department, JOHN DOES 1-5, Police Officers, Austin Police Department, BRANDON SHEFFY, Austin Police # 4622 and others
Joshua Conlan v. USA, et al
as 13-51066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE ANDREW AUSTIN, ELIZABETH COTTINGHAM and others
USA v. Joshua Conlan
as 13-50842
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN, also known as Joco
Conlan v. Pyant et al
as 5:2013ct03185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
Carlton Pyant, Unknown Guards 1-5, Jean Zula and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conlan v. Pyant et al
as 1:2013cv00649
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
Dr. Carlton Pyant, Unknown Guards 1-5, Dr. Kiwanna Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conlan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00641
Defendant:
Judge Andrew Austin, Daniel Castillo, Elizabeth Cottingham and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conlan v. Montgomery County Mental Health Treatment Facility et al
as 4:2013cv02007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Conlan
Defendant:
Montgomery County Mental Health Treatment Facility, GEO Group, Inc., Unknown Guard No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
