Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Juan Carrillo et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv01040
Defendant:
Riverside County California, Chad Bianco, Perez and others
Petitioner:
Riverside County (Municipal Corp) Sheriffs Dept
Plaintiff:
Juan Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Carrillo v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv03641
Petitioner:
Juan Carrillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Juan Carrillo-Mijares v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71695
Petitioner:
JUAN CARRILLO-MIJARES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Juan Carrillo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv05896
Defendant:
Detective Bucknell, Detective Bucknell, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carrillo
Carrillo-Acevedo v. USA
as 4:2015cv00174
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Carrillo-Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cruz v. Giti Tire Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01245
Defendant:
Giti Tire Corporation, Giti Tire (USA) Limited, Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carrillo Santa Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Juan Carrillo
as 12-50445
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN CARRILLO, AKA Cholo
Matsumoto et al vs. Transnational Financial Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00855
Defendant:
Ace Securities Corp., James D. Agee, Jr., Nichole Alford and others
Plaintiff:
Angelita Acuna, Romeo Acuna, Gerardo Agustin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Espinosa et al v. Meridias Capital, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00259
Defendant:
ANC of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-1, Bank Of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Erlinda Espinosa and Raul Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
