Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Reyes v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Reyes
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Reyes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Presinal et al v. 2690 Grocery Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02246
Plaintiff:
Rafael Presinal
Defendant:
2690 Grocery Corp. doing business as Fire House Deli, Juan Carlos Reyes and Liomard Mesa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
REYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02535
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS REYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cuevas et al v. L.I.C Builders LTD et al
as 1:2021cv04768
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Reyes, Jose Cuevas and Cesar Acosta
Defendant:
L.I.C Builders LTD, Montec Interiors, Inc., Blue Dynamics Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Reyes-Martinez
as 21-1418
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS REYES-MARTINEZ
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Reyes-Amaya v. Wilkinson
as 21-60105
Respondent:
Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Reyes-Amaya
Reyes v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv23650
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, State Attorneys Office and Office of the Attorney General State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Juan Reyes
as 20-16273
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS REYES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
