Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chavez v. Communications/Switchboard Does, et al
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Communications/Switchboard Does, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavez v. American Express et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and Prince of New York
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Chavez v. American Express, et al
as 23-55808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ, Prince of New York
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP and others
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chavez v. American Express et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 22-55747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CHAVEZ, AKA Chief Maestro Chavez, AKA Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant / Appellee:
JERMILL PENNINGTON, Property Manager
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 2:2022cv04763
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Jermill Pennington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chavez v. Pennington
as 3:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Jermill Pennington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chavez v. Capella
as 22-10012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant / Appellee:
Capella, et al
Chavez v. Capella University et al
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Capella, Capella University, Strategic Education Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
Ron Tubman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
