Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
BEY v. FOX et al
as 2:2021cv05092
Plaintiff:
JAYDE BROWN BEY
Defendant:
IDEE C. FOX, ERIC FEDER, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HAMM v. SANCHEZ et al
as 2:2021cv02800
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY JURY FOREMAN CHARLES LAST NAME UNKNOWN, JUAN R. SANCHEZ, CHARLES ZAGORSKI and others
Plaintiff:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Marlon Graham
as 21-1884
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JUAN R SANCHEZ
Petitioner:
In re: MARLON GRAHAM, a/k/a Marlan Graham
Kareem Stansbury v. , et alIn re: Kareem Stansbury v. , et al
as 20-2603
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, JUAN R SANCHEZ, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM J. STANSBURY
In re: David Robinson
as 20-2034
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JUAN R SANCHEZ
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ROBINSON
Antonello Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Asso, et al
as 19-3485
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR., CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, PROF 2013 S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
In re: Kareem Stansbury
as 19-1478
Undetermined:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, JUAN R SANCHEZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Nunez Rodriguez v. Veneca Parking Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01072
Defendant:
John Doe, Juan R. Sanchez, Jay and others
Plaintiff:
Junior Augustin Nunez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
