Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Busto v. Ellison
as 4:2023cv04734
Plaintiff:
Chad Busto
Defendant:
Judge Keith P. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Judge Keith Ellison
as 4:2023cv03726
Plaintiff:
Travis Dwight Green
Defendant:
Judge Keith Ellison, Kim Ogg and Devon Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Lee H Rosenthal, District Judge Keith P Ellison, US District Judge Lynn N Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: George Whaley, Jr., et al
as 22-2157
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE HENRY WHALEY, JR.
Respondent:
COUNTY OF CLINTON, CYNTHIA LOVE, Clerk of Courts, PRESIDENT JUDGE CRAIG P. MILLER and others
Caradine v. Faulder et al
as 3:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
Leartis K.M. Caradine
Defendant:
Judge Keith Faulder and Mendocino County Correctional Facility: Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Levesque v. Bruno et al
as 1:2021cv11400
Petitioner:
Andre Rene Levesque
Respondent:
Judge Keith Bruno and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bonilla v. San Benito County et al
as 4:2021cv02931
Defendant:
Judge Glenn Yabuno, Judge Keith D. Davis, Judge Robert O'Farrell and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
