Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lewis et al v. Loftin et al
as 3:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Lewis , Judith Lewis and Jerry Lee Lewis, III
Defendant:
Howard Ezekiel Loftin , Phoebe Lewis-Loftin , Myra Williams and others
Counter_claimant:
Ezekiel Asa Loftin, XII , Phoebe Lewis-Loftin and Myra Williams
Counter_defendant:
Jerry Lee Lewis, III , Judith Lewis , Lori Lee Lewis Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Loftin
as 2:2016cv02726
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Lewis , Judith Lewis , Lori Lewis and others
Defendant:
Ezekiel Loftin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melendez v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv01497
Defendant:
City of New York, Joseph Fox, FNU Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Patrick Roy Lewis
as 14-60062
Debtor:
In re: PATRICK ROY LEWIS
Appellant:
KALLMAN & COMPANY, LLP
Appellee:
DAVID K. GOTTLIEB, Trustee and JUDITH LEWIS
Lewis v. HUD
as 3:2012cv02540
Plaintiff:
Judith Lewis
Defendant:
HUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Judith Lewis v. Craig Watkins
as 10-10003
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUDITH LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG WATKINS, Dallas County District Attorney
Lewis v. Watkins
as 3:2009cv02077
Petitioner:
Judith Lewis
Respondent:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. Connecticut General Life Ins., et al
as 2:2008cv02882
Plaintiff:
Judith Lewis
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and United Technologies Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
