Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tolliver (PS) v. Simmons et al
as 1:2024cv01357
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Angela Simmons, Pastor Justine Simmons, Joseph Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tolliver (PS) v. Priest et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Priest, Victim Witness, Chruch Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Boykin (Brice)
as 21-2794
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Boykin, AKA Double O, Paul Arline, AKA Face, Joshua Arnold and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Brice, AKA Reack
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21845
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58717
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01599
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SIMMONS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00843
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Justin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fineola Ingram, et al v. Cole County, et al
as 16-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fineola Ingram, Justin Simmons and Brian Boykin
Defendant - Appellee:
Cole County, Sheriff Greg White and John Wheeler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
