Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Welfare Fund et al v. H & K Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc
as 2:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Welfare Fund , Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Pension Fund and Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Supplemental Pension Trust
Defendant:
H & K Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHEETS-BURNETTE v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11531
Plaintiff:
SANDRA K SHEETS-BURNETTE
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, JOHN DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maurice Neal v. Judith Raddatz, et al
as 10-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE NEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDITH A. RADDATZ, K. SHEETS and K. BEST
John Rawls v. Lynch, et al
as 10-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNCH and K. SHEETS
Brown v. Harrington et al
as 2:2009cv14211
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kirk Brown
Defendant:
Harrington, Jackson, Unknown Oosterhof and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Brown #181534 v. Harrington et al
as 1:2009cv00911
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kirk Brown #181534
Defendant:
Unknown Harrington, Unknown Jackson, Unknown Oosterhof and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Rawls v. Lynch, et al
as 09-2163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNCH and K. SHEETS
John Rawls v. Bruno, et al
as 09-2085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUNO, MDOC Corrections Officer, K SHEETS, Grievance Coordinator, NEWHALL, Officer and others
John Rawls v. Delo, et al
as 09-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
DELO, MDOC Corrections Officer and K. SHEETS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
