Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCCRAY v. DETAMORE, et al.
as 1:2020cv03006
Defendant:
D KODY, K STEPHEN, JOSHUA MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNEY MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEPHENS v. WARDEN
as 1:2019cv00084
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
LONNIE K. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01685
Defendant:
Mr. Kotey, D. Rains, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01321
Defendant:
. Kotey, . Ritz, D. Rains and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03064
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., D. Rains, . Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Superintendent
as 3:2011cv00274
Petitioner:
Lonnie K Stephens
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK v. MOHR & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01487
Defendant:
K. STEPHEN MOHR and MOHR & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jones-Jackson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones-Jackson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, M.B. Loftin, K. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ameritech Ben Plan, et al v. Foster-Hall, et al
as 1:1997cv01441
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Marsha D Johnson, Loyce J Newton, Brenda Gildersleeve and others
Plaintiff:
Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Ameritech Pension Plan, New Media Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Local 188 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Phyllis Barnes, Betty Bober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
