Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robinson #182351 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Robinson #182351
Defendant:
Jermey Bush, James Corrigan, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles McGlothan v. [unknown] Aikens, et al
as 23-1787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MELVIN MCGLOTHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A. AIKENS, Mailroom Staff, personal capacity, MICHAEL LACROSSE, Resident Unit Manager, personal capacity, K. BENOIT, Business Office Manager, personal capacity and others
McGlothan #845357 v. Aikens et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles McGlothan #845357
Defendant:
Unknown Aikens, Unknown Lacrosse, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Steven James and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Patriot Construction and Industrial LLC dba Patriot Heavy Civil and Industrial, LLC and Joseph K. Benoit
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Cruz v. Delgado et al
as 4:2016cv03568
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Cruz
Defendant:
Rolando Delgado, Jr, G Perkins, T Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benoit v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11306
Plaintiff:
John K Benoit
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Andre Alexander v. Penny Fillion, et al
as 15-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'ANDRE ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNY FILLION, UNKNOWN RUSSO, THERESA M. MERLING and others
Alexander #731077 v. Fillion et al
as 2:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dandre Alexander #731077
Defendant:
Penny Fillion, Unknown Russo, Theresa Merling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett #200640 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Stephen Marschke, Greg McQuiggin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
